Intro to Film
Hello...
I'm Tom Powers, a film major from Glen Ellyn, Illinois. I have been an avid movie watcher for many years, and I have increased my film consumption during quarantine, for better or for worse. I would like to make my own films but have never made a real attempt to do so.
To briefly address our discussion from class, regarding whether technology is helpful or harmful to filmmaking... I failed to mention the Wachowski sisters, particularly Speed Racer (2008) and the Matrix trilogy as examples of film aided by advances in technology. In particular, their color grading, rapid editing and the constantly moving camera create a modern ambience that I have never felt in older films. Certain montages and effects in these films could simply never be achieved in prior decades. Reportedly, they are developing new types of dollies for the upcoming fourth Matrix.
Still from Speed Racer |
However, I think that Eisenstein is probably the best editor I've ever come across despite working with some of the earliest film technology. Orson Welles began making features in the 1940s and I don't think that a better filmmaker exists today. In short, advances in technology can absolutely push the boundaries of filmmaking, but unfortunately forward-thinking uses of technology are few and far between today. The fundamentals are generally executed just as well, if not better in older work, and in some cases the "attraction" of technology feels like a crutch in recent films (like Avatar).
I definitely agree that tech pushes the boundaries, and it makes me think about how they were first used. Earlier films had better use of the tech. Nowadays, it is overdone with the effects, creating distractions more than developments. It is most definitely a crutch.
ReplyDelete